Search by property

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

List of results

• Mitrayogi  + (Flourished between 1150 and 1250.)

• Buddhaguhya  + (Flourished between 750 and 810.)
• Mañjuśrīmitra  + (Flourished in the 8th century.)
• 'jam mgon kong sprul  + (Jamgön Kongtrul passed away on the twenty- … Jamgön Kongtrul passed away on the twenty-seventh day of the eleventh month of the earth-pig year of the fifteenth sexagenary cycle. Nesar Tashi Chöpel, who recorded the date, likely used the Tsurpu calendrical system, for which the Tibetan date would translate to December 29, 1899. The more commonly used Pukpa system had two eleventh months in the earth-pig year, leading scholars to give Kongtrul's death as falling either on December 29, 1899 (the first eleventh month), or January 28, 1900 (the second). month), or January 28, 1900 (the second).)
• mkhan po gang shar  + (The above date of his passing is based on … The above date of his passing is based on the assertion that he died shortly after being jailed during the Chinese invasion. However, there are apparently other reports that he actually remained in prison for twenty years and passed away sometime around 1980.ears and passed away sometime around 1980.)
• rong zom chos kyi bzang po  + (The dates 1042–1136 derive from BDRC but a … The dates 1042–1136 derive from BDRC but are not without controversy. Rongzom's collected works compiled by Ju Mipham Gyatso give 1040 as Rongzom's birth date and Tarthang Tulku and ''The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism'' (2014) both give 1012–1088. ''The Blue Annals'' reports Rongzom giving teachings in 1139. Thus, exact dates are unclear. See Sur, ''The Early Tibetan Practice of Buddhist Philosophy'', 349-250.ractice of Buddhist Philosophy'', 349-250.)
• Nāropa  + (The dates for Nāropa here are from BDRC, h … The dates for Nāropa here are from BDRC, https://www.tbrc.org/#!rid=P3085. However, other sources suggest earlier dates, with a date of birth of 956(?) and a date of death of 1040. Regarding the date of birth, see Newman, John. "The Epoch of the Kālacakra Tantra." Indo-Iranian Journal 41 (1998): 319-349.: 347, note 10.[1]. Regarding the date of death, see Wylie, T. "Dating the Death of Naropa." L. Hercus et al., eds. Indological and Buddhist Studies. Volume in Honour of Professor J.W. de Jong on his Sixtieth Birthday. Canberra, 1982. on his Sixtieth Birthday. Canberra, 1982.)
• karma chags med  + (While BDRC gives 1613 – 1678, Treasury of … While BDRC gives 1613 – 1678, Treasury of Lives by Ngawang Sherpa updates these with sources in July 2026:" The commonly given date of 1613 is not supported by his autobiography. This account is based on Karma Chakme's outer autobiography, titled ''Rigs rus dang 'brel zhing sangs rgyas kyi bstan pa'i 'jug sgo dang mthun pa phyi yi rnam thar'' (cited under ''Gnas mdo karma chags med'' 2012), in which he details his activities from birth to age fifty-two. The remainder of the biography is based on ''Rgyal ba gnas mdo pa'i bla brgyud dang dam pa'i chos kyi byung ba mdor bsdus dwangs shel me long'' (cited under Unknown. 2010. ''Rgyal ba gnas mdo pa'i bla brgyud dang dam pa'i chos kyi byung ba mdor bsdus dwangs shel me long''. Gnas mdo gsang sngags chos' phel gling. BDRC MW1KG8537.) unless otherwise noted."</br></br>"Nedo Karma Chakme (gnas mdo karma chags med) was born in 1609, the earth female bird year of the tenth sexagenary cycle, in the Nyomtod (nyoms stod) region of Kham, northwest of Chamdo. "</br></br>"He passed away in November 1678, on the first day of the tenth month of the earth male horse year."tenth month of the earth male horse year.")
• Candragomin  + (While there is no complete scholarly conse … While there is no complete scholarly consensus, the majority of modern scholarship seems to place Candragomin in either the 5th-6th centuries CE (the earlier estimate) or more commonly in the 7th century CE (approximately 600-650 CE- See Mark Tatz research), with the latter being the more widely accepted timeframe among contemporary scholars.ted timeframe among contemporary scholars.)
• Gter bdag gling pa 'gyur med rdo rje  + (d)